|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
3
   |
Posted - 2017.06.10 02:30:16 -
[1] - Quote
So what's the point of having a 30b Super with heavy fighters that cost me more than a t1 battleship per flight?
get rid of afk ishtars and kill off invulnerable rorquals if you wanna hurt the nullsec isk fountain.
they cost nothing, require no effort, and put mountains of isk into the game.
and Titans may get amazing ticks, but they lose a good amount of it to fuel production.
(while risking almost 100b mind you)
You guys made WH space with the theme of Risk VS Reward
but you keep nerfing the big ticket risks by taking away their reward for risking that much.
i mean you guys just gave goonswarm a personalized isk faucet they cleared with punishers.
Might as well be fox news with how fair and balanced this is.
There's almost no reason to have a super these days.
it's so hard to not be angry about this. |
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 02:44:57 -
[2] - Quote
Khara Hirl wrote:
Ishtars also hit 1/3rd of what a carrier can hit per tick, don't really want to hear that crap. Also the reason they work is because they are fast and the drones are good. That' what gallente focuses on for their Hacs.
yeah, ishtars also cost 1/5th of what a carrier does, so i dont really wanna hear that crap either.
RvR |
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
4
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 02:59:46 -
[3] - Quote
Khara Hirl wrote:Aries Stark wrote:Khara Hirl wrote:
Ishtars also hit 1/3rd of what a carrier can hit per tick, don't really want to hear that crap. Also the reason they work is because they are fast and the drones are good. That' what gallente focuses on for their Hacs.
yeah, ishtars also cost 1/5th of what a carrier does, so i dont really wanna hear that crap either. RvR Carriers don't make 5 times what a ishtar does because they are slower to move not because they cost 5 times more. Hell making 3 times more then an ishtar for a ship that cost 5 times more, is a nice bump up in pay to be honest. RVR my ass, excuses excuses maybe you should stop blinging out your ships.
300m ishtar pulls in about 20m ticks
2b carrier pulls in about 45m ticks
25b Super pulls in about 120m ticks
seems like a fair progression to me.
Bling is irreverent to this conversation.
If production is the problem, make it easier to destroy, because those numbers look Low AF. |
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 03:25:57 -
[4] - Quote
We should just take away drones ability to auto-aggro npc's while we're at it.
GG Afk ratting forever (unless youre smart enough to use auto-targeting missiles which should also be removed).
|
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 12:07:23 -
[5] - Quote
Jo Kiyoko wrote:A carrier once killed my blackbird, the multiple logi didn't even had the strength to repair it, i was so pissed that It destroyed my ship so fast and in a cheap manner. I hope you sissy carrier 'pilots' get what coming to you.
Yeah, those fighters are worth 10x what your blackbird was, on a hull worth over 65x what you ship was. so yeah thats how carriers are supposed to work.
|
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 19:04:09 -
[6] - Quote
Can we see data charts showing specifically what ships are being used to pull in this isk?
yeah we see that bounty payouts skyrocketed (now that you made it easier for players to fly supers and carriers so more people are actually doing it) but i don't see any information on exactly how players are making these bounties.
Are titan ratters the real problem but you've gone and lumped them in the same category as carriers?
who knows, you're not showing us specific data.
I'm skeptical that these changes will sway the incoming amount of isk into the game by a noticeable amount.
The changes only seem to increase the time players will have to spend out there ratting each day since you're not exactly presenting any alternative isk sink.
In fact you're kind of discouraging the use of these large vessels which will in-turn result is less flown and less lost in combat.
Thus adding to the problem of us not having anything fun to take our isk away.
|
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 11:48:55 -
[7] - Quote
Sadr Dillinger wrote:The 'no cyno' change to carriers really just takes the bloody biscuit in adding insult to injury. Play your own game for crying out loud! 
I haven't seen a post about removing cynos from carriers, do you have a link? |
Aries Stark
OZONED
The-Culture
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 19:30:16 -
[8] - Quote
Thats a much more reasonable balance pass.
I would like to see content that encourages pvp instead of all this pve drabble to increase the isk sink.
Maybe these t3c changes will give us more pvp content in nullsec. |
|
|
| |
|